You Ask, We Answer: Season 2, Episode 7 of The 3NR Podcast
27
January
As promised, the latest edition of The 3NR Podcast centers entirely around reader/listener-submitted questions. With the full crew on board, the discussion covers a lot of ground including email evidence, the way that judges should (and do) balance explanation versus evidence, debating the case against COIN affirmatives, and more. Click on over to podcast.the3nr.com to download the new episode or subscribe to the podcast in iTunes. We didn’t get to everything, so we will dedicate another future episode to the remaining questions we’ve received from our listeners. If you have something you’d like us to discuss, please let us know.
OMG I'm not nearly done and I have no idea how Roy is coming back from this "winner's win" hole he dug. Batterman waaaaay out in front.
Its magic crowe, its magic….
please don't assume what winners win means, it was not explained.
Roy's last sentence contained a smaller number of words than Scott's, so Scott gets 100% risk of his argument.
scottyp – do you still happen to have the unpublished pan dissertation?
I never actually had it- it was Roy "I hate the K" Levkov who emailed Pan from emory, so he may. You could also check out online databases (http://www.openthesis.org/documents/Discourses-China-in-International-Relations-278207.html)
yeah I did a little searching, the only database that has the text of the thesis is the Australian Nat'l university's digital thesis databse, which requires that you be a student or faculty at the school; if anybody works for the ANU, knock yourself out: http://thesis.anu.edu.au/public/adt-ANU20050528.1…
for the next podcast, do you have any advice for how to improve during the "off" season (for kids who aren't going to the toc, how to keep improving between now and camp)
preparing for new affs at the toc, what to do before the debate when they say "new," what to do during the 1ac, etc
http://www.the3nr.com/2010/04/06/so-you-want-to-w…
deploying the positive peace critique on the negative – not as a miscellaneous 2nc card on a separate gender kritik, but as it's own, independent position
debating GDS's new "pirates aff"/"piradical politics aff"–how to tackle this strategically and not just let them out-ridiculous you.
Can y'all address the whole "debating with your regular partner at camp vs. not doing that" issue that never made it onto the last podcast?