web hosting

Defeating the K-Countering Shenanigans

To add a little balance, and to be less of a dirty hippie, I figured I would post a little about how to defeat the K. So in this post I will look at a few K practices, explain why they work, and then like a fancy salad deconstruct them.

Posted on by Scott Phillips

Comments Off

Game Winning Analysis

One of the things judges/coaches beat into debaters heads over and over again is that they need more explanation of things. Instead of explaining the importance of this instead I thought I would post some examples of how to explain things better.

Throwdown- Pics Bad

This post will be in more 1AR form than nuanced explanation. Extend our offense- pics artificially inflate bad disads by creating any risk of a link analysis which skews research and pre round prep focus. We’ll defend the whole plan, but forcing us to defend isolated parts in a vacuum is unpredictable and doesn’t reflect [...]

Early Tournament Success

If you are a 2A going into the first tournaments of this year you have a pretty good idea what you need to prepare for: cap k, coercion k, pov k, politics, states cp, agents, a few T arguments. Compared to last years topic where there were 20 different oil disads, 20 more natural gas [...]

The States CP

As is becoming an annoying trend, Stefan has beaten me to the punch on a how to debate the states CP post- you can read it here http://www.planetdebate.com/blogs/view/357 For an aff perspective here are some posts I made last year http://spdebate.blogspot.com/2008/07/states-cp-part-1.html http://spdebate.blogspot.com/2008/07/states-cp-part-2-theory.html http://spdebate.blogspot.com/2008/09/states-cp-part-3-thinking-strategically.html

Posted on by Scott Phillips

Comments Off

Adapting at Nationals

If you actually want to do well at NFL/CFL you will need to adapt. Most people do this terribly or not at all. If your attitude is “whatever I do what I want” well then you can do that wherever you live and not need to go to Alabama. 1. Slow down- most judges will [...]

Aesthetics of Debate

First,  let me clarify cause it seems as if this being taken to an extreme.  At no point did I say do not read new affs.  I advanced a nuanced difference between one shot affs with lower quality evidence versus the merits of breaking a strong new aff.  If you are confused about the difference [...]

New Aff Controversy

I think this is generally a pretty lame discussion.  Every year at end of the year tournaments a lot of stupid affs are broken. During the year a lot of dumb affs are broken just as a lot of dumb disads, counterplans etc etc. Not really a big deal. A few points not directly addressed [...]

The Meaning Of “Offense/Defense: There’s Only A Risk”

Debaters say a lot of things in debates that are not arguments in themselves but which contain cues that trigger meaning in the minds of their audience (their opponents and, most importantly, the judge). As Roy discussed in an article about “Defense”, one such cue is used to frame the way the judge approaches his [...]

Posted on by Bill Batterman

Comments Off

Defense-

Too many times after asking my kids or others at tournaments how their round went I get an answer like, “We lost we didn’t have any offense on the da.” So??? Not having offense on a DA should not mean an auto aff lose. While with some (read most) judges controlling things like issue specific [...]